Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
The History and Doctrine of American Copyright Protection for Fashion Design: Managing Mazer
|Title:||The History and Doctrine of American Copyright Protection for Fashion Design: Managing Mazer|
|Publisher:||Harv. J. Sports & Ent. L|
|Citation:||Charles E. Colman, The History and Doctrine of American Copyright Protection for Fashion Design: Managing Mazer, 7 Harv. J. Sports & Ent. L. 151, 208 (2016)|
|Abstract:||In order to be copyright-eligible, a component of fashion design must be not only "fixed" and "original" (as discussed in the previous installment of this five-article series, On 'Originality'), but also constitute a work whose aesthetic characteristics are separable from the "utilitarian" material to which it is affixed.1 In this installment of The History and Principles of American Copyright Protection for Fashion Design, I trace the trajectory of the courts'
rulings on the copyrightability of certain aspects of fashion design in the wake of the Supreme Court's pivotal 1954 decision in Mazer v. Stein.' I will begin with a discussion of the background and substance of the Supreme Court's Mazer decision. I will then provide a series of more or less detailed chronologies of lower-court rulings on the copyrightability of fashion design between the mid-1950s and mid-1970s, resulting in the crystallization
of certain categories of presumptively copyright-eligible fashion works-namely, fabric patterns and lace; focal images placed on wearable objects; jewelry design; and some costume works.
|Appears in Collections:||
Colman, Charles E.|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.